terraform-patterns — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (alireza__terraform-patterns) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
2 heuristic flags to review
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
About this skill
Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user…
📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: "terraform-patterns"
description: "Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices."
license: MIT
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: Alireza Rezvani
category: engineering
updated: 2026-03-15
---
# Terraform Patterns
> Predictable infrastructure. Secure state. Modules that compose. No drift.
Opinionated Terraform workflow that turns sprawling HCL into well-structured, secure, production-grade infrastructure code. Covers module design, state management, provider patterns, security hardening, and CI/CD integration.
Not a Terraform tutorial — a set of concrete decisions about how to write infrastructure code that doesn't break at 3 AM.
---
## Slash Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---------|-------------|
| `/terraform:review` | Analyze Terraform code for anti-patterns, security issues, and structure problems |
| `/terraform:module` | Design or refactor a Terraform module with proper inputs, outputs, and composition |
| `/terraform:security` | Audit Terraform code for security vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and IAM misconfigurations |
---
## When This Skill Activates
Recognize these patterns from the user:
- "Review this Terraform code"
- "Design a Terraform module for..."
- "My Terraform state is..."
- "Set up remote state backend"
- "Multi-region Terraform deployment"
- "Terraform security review"
- "Module structure best practices"
- "Terraform CI/CD pipeline"
- Any request involving: `.tf` files, HCL, Terraform modules, state management, provider configuration, infrastructure-as-code
If the user has `.tf` files or wants to provision infrastructure with Terraform → this skill applies.
---
## Workflow
### `/terraform:review` — Terraform Code Review
1. **Analyze current state**
- Read all `.tf` files in the target directory
- Identify module structure (flat vs nested)
- Count resources, data sources, variables, outputs
- Check naming conventions
2. **Apply review checklist**
```
MODULE STRUCTURE
├── Variables have descriptions and type constraints
├── Outputs expose only what consumers need
├── Resources use consistent naming: {provider}_{type}_{purpose}
├── Locals used for computed values and DRY expressions
└── No hardcoded values — everything parameterized or in locals
STATE & BACKEND
├── Remote backend configured (S3, GCS, Azure Blob, Terraform Cloud)
├── State locking enabled (DynamoDB for S3, native for others)
├── State encryption at rest enabled
├── No secrets stored in state (or state access is restricted)
└── Workspaces or directory isolation for environments
PROVIDERS
├── Version constraints use pessimistic operator: ~> 5.0
├── Required providers block in terraform {} block
├── Provider aliases for multi-region or multi-account
└── No provider configuration in child modules
SECURITY
├── No hardcoded secrets, keys, or passwords
├── IAM follows least-privilege principle
├── Encryption enabled for storage, databases, secrets
├── Security groups are not overly permissive (no 0.0.0.0/0 ingress on sensitive ports)
└── Sensitive variables marked with sensitive = true
```
3. **Generate report**
```bash
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform
```
4. **Run security scan**
```bash
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
```
### `/terraform:module` — Module Design
1. **Identify module scope**
- Single responsibility: one module = one logical grouping
- Determine inputs (variables), outputs, and resource boundaries
- Decide: flat module (single directory) vs nested (calling child modules)
2. **Apply module design checklist**
```
STRUCTURE
├── main.tf — Primary resources
├── variables.tf — All input variables with descriptions and types
├── outputs.tf — All outputs with descriptions
├── versions.tf — terraform {} block with required_providers
├── locals.tf — Computed values and naming conventions
├── data.tf — Data sources (if any)
└── README.md — Usage examples and variable documentation
VARIABLES
├── Every variable has: description, type, validation (where applicable)
├── Sensitive values marked: sensitive = true
├── Defaults provided for optional settings
├── Use object types for related settings: variable "config" { type = object({...}) }
└── Validate with: validation { condition = ... }
OUTPUTS
├── Output IDs, ARNs, endpoints — things consumers need
├── Include description on every output
├── Mark sensitive outputs: sensitive = true
└── Don't output entire resources — only specific attributes
COMPOSITION
├── Root module calls child modules
├── Child modules never call other child modules
├── Pass values explicitly — no hidden data source lookups in child modules
├── Provider configuration only in root module
└── Use module "name" { source = "./modules/name" }
```
3. **Generate module scaffold**
- Output file structure with boilerplate
- Include variable validation blocks
- Add lifecycle rules where appropriate
### `/terraform:security` — Security Audit
1. **Code-level audit**
| Check | Severity | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Hardcoded secrets in `.tf` files | Critical | Use variables with sensitive = true or vault |
| IAM policy with `*` actions | Critical | Scope to specific actions and resources |
| Security group with 0.0.0.0/0 on port 22/3389 | Critical | Restrict to known CIDR blocks or use SSM/bastion |
| S3 bucket without encryption | High | Add `server_side_encryption_configuration` block |
| S3 bucket with public access | High | Add `aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block` |
| RDS without encryption | High | Set `storage_encrypted = true` |
| RDS publicly accessible | High | Set `publicly_accessible = false` |
| CloudTrail not enabled | Medium | Add `aws_cloudtrail` resource |
| Missing `prevent_destroy` on stateful resources | Medium | Add `lifecycle { prevent_destroy = true }` |
| Variables without `sensitive = true` for secrets | Medium | Add `sensitive = true` to secret variables |
2. **State security audit**
| Check | Severity | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Local state file | Critical | Migrate to remote backend with encryption |
| Remote state without encryption | High | Enable encryption on backend (SSE-S3, KMS) |
| No state locking | High | Enable DynamoDB for S3, native for TF Cloud |
| State accessible to all team members | Medium | Restrict via IAM policies or TF Cloud teams |
3. **Generate security report**
```bash
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json
```
---
## Tooling
### `scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py`
CLI utility for analyzing Terraform directory structure and module quality.
**Features:**
- Resource and data source counting
- Variable and output analysis (missing descriptions, types, validation)
- Naming convention checks
- Module composition detection
- File structure validation
- JSON and text output
**Usage:**
```bash
# Analyze a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform
# JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform --output json
# Analyze a specific module
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./modules/vpc
```
### `scripts/tf_security_scanner.py`
CLI utility for scanning `.tf` files for common security issues.
**Features:**
- Hardcoded secret detection (AWS keys, passwords, tokens)
- Overly permissive IAM policy detection
- Open security group detection (0.0.0.0/0 on sensitive ports)
- Missing encryption checks (S3, RDS, EBS)
- Public access detection (S3, RDS, EC2)
- Sensitive variable audit
- JSON and text output
**Usage:**
```bash
# Scan a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
# JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json
# Strict mode (elevate warnings)
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --strict
```
---
## Module Design Patterns
### Pattern 1: Flat Module (Small/Medium Projects)
```
infrastructure/
├── main.tf # All resources
├── variables.tf # All inputs
├── outputs.tf # All outputs
├── versions.tf # Provider requirements
├── terraform.tfvars # Environment values (not committed)
└── backend.tf # Remote state configuration
```
Best for: Single application, < 20 resources, one team owns everything.
### Pattern 2: Nested Modules (Medium/Large Projects)
```
infrastructure/
├── environments/
│ ├── dev/
│ │ ├── main.tf # Calls modules with dev params
│ │ ├── backend.tf # Dev state backend
│ │ └── terraform.tfvars
│ ├── staging/
│ │ └── ...
│ └── prod/
│ └── ...
├── modules/
│ ├── networking/
│ │ ├── main.tf
│ │ ├── variables.tf
│ │ └── outputs.tf
│ ├── compute/
│ │ └── ...
│ └── database/
│ └── ...
└── versions.tf
```
Best for: Multiple environments, shared infrastructure patterns, team collaboration.
### Pattern 3: Mono-Repo with Terragrunt
```
infrastructure/
├── terragrunt.hcl # Root config
├── modules/ # Reusable modules
│ ├── vpc/
│ ├── eks/
│ └── rds/
├── dev/
│ ├── terragrunt.hcl # Dev overrides
│ ├── vpc/
│ │ └── terragrunt.hcl # Module invocation
│ └── eks/
│ └── terragrunt.hcl
└── prod/
├── terragrunt.hcl
└── ...
```
Best for: Large-scale, many environments, DRY configuration, team-level isolation.
---
## Provider Configuration Patterns
### Version Pinning
```hcl
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.5.0"
required_providers {
aws = {
source = "hashicorp/aws"
version = "~> 5.0" # Allow 5.x, block 6.0
}
random = {
source = "hashicorp/random"
version = "~> 3.5"
}
}
}
```
### Multi-Region with Aliases
```hcl
provider "aws" {
region = "us-east-1"
}
provider "aws" {
alias = "west"
region = "us-west-2"
}
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "primary" {
bucket = "my-app-primary"
}
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "replica" {
provider = aws.west
bucket = "my-app-replica"
}
```
### Multi-Account with Assume Role
```hcl
provider "aws" {
alias = "production"
region = "us-east-1"
assume_role {
role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::PROD_ACCOUNT_ID:role/TerraformRole"
}
}
```
---
## State Management Decision Tree
```
Single developer, small project?
├── Yes → Local state (but migrate to remote ASAP)
└── No
├── Using Terraform Cloud/Enterprise?
│ └── Yes → TF Cloud native backend (built-in locking, encryption, RBAC)
└── No
├── AWS?
│ └── S3 + DynamoDB (encryption, locking, versioning)
├── GCP?
│ └── GCS bucket (native locking, encryption)
├── Azure?
│ └── Azure Blob Storage (native locking, encryption)
└── Other?
└── Consul or PostgreSQL backend
Environment isolation strategy:
├── Separate state files per environment (recommended)
│ ├── Option A: Separate directories (dev/, staging/, prod/)
│ └── Option B: Terraform workspaces (simpler but less isolation)
└── Single state file for all environments (never do this)
```
---
## CI/CD Integration Patterns
### GitHub Actions Plan/Apply
```yaml
# .github/workflows/terraform.yml
name: Terraform
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['terraform/**']
push:
branches: [main]
paths: ['terraform/**']
jobs:
plan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
st
… (truncated)Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.