terraform-patterns — quality + safety report

In the Skillier index (alireza__terraform-patterns) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage

A
Quality
92/100
Safety

2 heuristic flags to review

Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →

Skillproof quality grade A

📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.

Quality notes

Skill is large (~5245 tokens)
medium · quality · body
→ Tighten to the essential procedure; move long reference material to linked files.

About this skill

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user…

📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: "terraform-patterns"
description: "Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices."
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  author: Alireza Rezvani
  category: engineering
  updated: 2026-03-15
---

# Terraform Patterns

> Predictable infrastructure. Secure state. Modules that compose. No drift.

Opinionated Terraform workflow that turns sprawling HCL into well-structured, secure, production-grade infrastructure code. Covers module design, state management, provider patterns, security hardening, and CI/CD integration.

Not a Terraform tutorial — a set of concrete decisions about how to write infrastructure code that doesn't break at 3 AM.

---

## Slash Commands

| Command | What it does |
|---------|-------------|
| `/terraform:review` | Analyze Terraform code for anti-patterns, security issues, and structure problems |
| `/terraform:module` | Design or refactor a Terraform module with proper inputs, outputs, and composition |
| `/terraform:security` | Audit Terraform code for security vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and IAM misconfigurations |

---

## When This Skill Activates

Recognize these patterns from the user:

- "Review this Terraform code"
- "Design a Terraform module for..."
- "My Terraform state is..."
- "Set up remote state backend"
- "Multi-region Terraform deployment"
- "Terraform security review"
- "Module structure best practices"
- "Terraform CI/CD pipeline"
- Any request involving: `.tf` files, HCL, Terraform modules, state management, provider configuration, infrastructure-as-code

If the user has `.tf` files or wants to provision infrastructure with Terraform → this skill applies.

---

## Workflow

### `/terraform:review` — Terraform Code Review

1. **Analyze current state**
   - Read all `.tf` files in the target directory
   - Identify module structure (flat vs nested)
   - Count resources, data sources, variables, outputs
   - Check naming conventions

2. **Apply review checklist**

   ```
   MODULE STRUCTURE
   ├── Variables have descriptions and type constraints
   ├── Outputs expose only what consumers need
   ├── Resources use consistent naming: {provider}_{type}_{purpose}
   ├── Locals used for computed values and DRY expressions
   └── No hardcoded values — everything parameterized or in locals

   STATE & BACKEND
   ├── Remote backend configured (S3, GCS, Azure Blob, Terraform Cloud)
   ├── State locking enabled (DynamoDB for S3, native for others)
   ├── State encryption at rest enabled
   ├── No secrets stored in state (or state access is restricted)
   └── Workspaces or directory isolation for environments

   PROVIDERS
   ├── Version constraints use pessimistic operator: ~> 5.0
   ├── Required providers block in terraform {} block
   ├── Provider aliases for multi-region or multi-account
   └── No provider configuration in child modules

   SECURITY
   ├── No hardcoded secrets, keys, or passwords
   ├── IAM follows least-privilege principle
   ├── Encryption enabled for storage, databases, secrets
   ├── Security groups are not overly permissive (no 0.0.0.0/0 ingress on sensitive ports)
   └── Sensitive variables marked with sensitive = true
   ```

3. **Generate report**
   ```bash
   python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform
   ```

4. **Run security scan**
   ```bash
   python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
   ```

### `/terraform:module` — Module Design

1. **Identify module scope**
   - Single responsibility: one module = one logical grouping
   - Determine inputs (variables), outputs, and resource boundaries
   - Decide: flat module (single directory) vs nested (calling child modules)

2. **Apply module design checklist**

   ```
   STRUCTURE
   ├── main.tf        — Primary resources
   ├── variables.tf   — All input variables with descriptions and types
   ├── outputs.tf     — All outputs with descriptions
   ├── versions.tf    — terraform {} block with required_providers
   ├── locals.tf      — Computed values and naming conventions
   ├── data.tf        — Data sources (if any)
   └── README.md      — Usage examples and variable documentation

   VARIABLES
   ├── Every variable has: description, type, validation (where applicable)
   ├── Sensitive values marked: sensitive = true
   ├── Defaults provided for optional settings
   ├── Use object types for related settings: variable "config" { type = object({...}) }
   └── Validate with: validation { condition = ... }

   OUTPUTS
   ├── Output IDs, ARNs, endpoints — things consumers need
   ├── Include description on every output
   ├── Mark sensitive outputs: sensitive = true
   └── Don't output entire resources — only specific attributes

   COMPOSITION
   ├── Root module calls child modules
   ├── Child modules never call other child modules
   ├── Pass values explicitly — no hidden data source lookups in child modules
   ├── Provider configuration only in root module
   └── Use module "name" { source = "./modules/name" }
   ```

3. **Generate module scaffold**
   - Output file structure with boilerplate
   - Include variable validation blocks
   - Add lifecycle rules where appropriate

### `/terraform:security` — Security Audit

1. **Code-level audit**

   | Check | Severity | Fix |
   |-------|----------|-----|
   | Hardcoded secrets in `.tf` files | Critical | Use variables with sensitive = true or vault |
   | IAM policy with `*` actions | Critical | Scope to specific actions and resources |
   | Security group with 0.0.0.0/0 on port 22/3389 | Critical | Restrict to known CIDR blocks or use SSM/bastion |
   | S3 bucket without encryption | High | Add `server_side_encryption_configuration` block |
   | S3 bucket with public access | High | Add `aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block` |
   | RDS without encryption | High | Set `storage_encrypted = true` |
   | RDS publicly accessible | High | Set `publicly_accessible = false` |
   | CloudTrail not enabled | Medium | Add `aws_cloudtrail` resource |
   | Missing `prevent_destroy` on stateful resources | Medium | Add `lifecycle { prevent_destroy = true }` |
   | Variables without `sensitive = true` for secrets | Medium | Add `sensitive = true` to secret variables |

2. **State security audit**

   | Check | Severity | Fix |
   |-------|----------|-----|
   | Local state file | Critical | Migrate to remote backend with encryption |
   | Remote state without encryption | High | Enable encryption on backend (SSE-S3, KMS) |
   | No state locking | High | Enable DynamoDB for S3, native for TF Cloud |
   | State accessible to all team members | Medium | Restrict via IAM policies or TF Cloud teams |

3. **Generate security report**
   ```bash
   python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
   python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json
   ```

---

## Tooling

### `scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py`

CLI utility for analyzing Terraform directory structure and module quality.

**Features:**
- Resource and data source counting
- Variable and output analysis (missing descriptions, types, validation)
- Naming convention checks
- Module composition detection
- File structure validation
- JSON and text output

**Usage:**
```bash
# Analyze a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform

# JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform --output json

# Analyze a specific module
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./modules/vpc
```

### `scripts/tf_security_scanner.py`

CLI utility for scanning `.tf` files for common security issues.

**Features:**
- Hardcoded secret detection (AWS keys, passwords, tokens)
- Overly permissive IAM policy detection
- Open security group detection (0.0.0.0/0 on sensitive ports)
- Missing encryption checks (S3, RDS, EBS)
- Public access detection (S3, RDS, EC2)
- Sensitive variable audit
- JSON and text output

**Usage:**
```bash
# Scan a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform

# JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json

# Strict mode (elevate warnings)
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --strict
```

---

## Module Design Patterns

### Pattern 1: Flat Module (Small/Medium Projects)

```
infrastructure/
├── main.tf          # All resources
├── variables.tf     # All inputs
├── outputs.tf       # All outputs
├── versions.tf      # Provider requirements
├── terraform.tfvars # Environment values (not committed)
└── backend.tf       # Remote state configuration
```

Best for: Single application, < 20 resources, one team owns everything.

### Pattern 2: Nested Modules (Medium/Large Projects)

```
infrastructure/
├── environments/
│   ├── dev/
│   │   ├── main.tf          # Calls modules with dev params
│   │   ├── backend.tf       # Dev state backend
│   │   └── terraform.tfvars
│   ├── staging/
│   │   └── ...
│   └── prod/
│       └── ...
├── modules/
│   ├── networking/
│   │   ├── main.tf
│   │   ├── variables.tf
│   │   └── outputs.tf
│   ├── compute/
│   │   └── ...
│   └── database/
│       └── ...
└── versions.tf
```

Best for: Multiple environments, shared infrastructure patterns, team collaboration.

### Pattern 3: Mono-Repo with Terragrunt

```
infrastructure/
├── terragrunt.hcl           # Root config
├── modules/                  # Reusable modules
│   ├── vpc/
│   ├── eks/
│   └── rds/
├── dev/
│   ├── terragrunt.hcl       # Dev overrides
│   ├── vpc/
│   │   └── terragrunt.hcl   # Module invocation
│   └── eks/
│       └── terragrunt.hcl
└── prod/
    ├── terragrunt.hcl
    └── ...
```

Best for: Large-scale, many environments, DRY configuration, team-level isolation.

---

## Provider Configuration Patterns

### Version Pinning
```hcl
terraform {
  required_version = ">= 1.5.0"

  required_providers {
    aws = {
      source  = "hashicorp/aws"
      version = "~> 5.0"    # Allow 5.x, block 6.0
    }
    random = {
      source  = "hashicorp/random"
      version = "~> 3.5"
    }
  }
}
```

### Multi-Region with Aliases
```hcl
provider "aws" {
  region = "us-east-1"
}

provider "aws" {
  alias  = "west"
  region = "us-west-2"
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "primary" {
  bucket = "my-app-primary"
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "replica" {
  provider = aws.west
  bucket   = "my-app-replica"
}
```

### Multi-Account with Assume Role
```hcl
provider "aws" {
  alias  = "production"
  region = "us-east-1"

  assume_role {
    role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::PROD_ACCOUNT_ID:role/TerraformRole"
  }
}
```

---

## State Management Decision Tree

```
Single developer, small project?
├── Yes → Local state (but migrate to remote ASAP)
└── No
    ├── Using Terraform Cloud/Enterprise?
    │   └── Yes → TF Cloud native backend (built-in locking, encryption, RBAC)
    └── No
        ├── AWS?
        │   └── S3 + DynamoDB (encryption, locking, versioning)
        ├── GCP?
        │   └── GCS bucket (native locking, encryption)
        ├── Azure?
        │   └── Azure Blob Storage (native locking, encryption)
        └── Other?
            └── Consul or PostgreSQL backend

Environment isolation strategy:
├── Separate state files per environment (recommended)
│   ├── Option A: Separate directories (dev/, staging/, prod/)
│   └── Option B: Terraform workspaces (simpler but less isolation)
└── Single state file for all environments (never do this)
```

---

## CI/CD Integration Patterns

### GitHub Actions Plan/Apply

```yaml
# .github/workflows/terraform.yml
name: Terraform
on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ['terraform/**']
  push:
    branches: [main]
    paths: ['terraform/**']

jobs:
  plan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
    st

… (truncated)
Scan or optimize your own skill →

Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.

Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.