c4-context — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (antigravity__c4-context) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
✓ Clean — no heuristic safety flags surfaced.
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
No quality issues flagged. ✓
About this skill
Expert C4 Context-level documentation specialist. Creates high-level system context diagrams, documents personas, user journeys, system features, and external dependencies.
📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: c4-context
description: Expert C4 Context-level documentation specialist. Creates high-level system context diagrams, documents personas, user journeys, system features, and external dependencies.
risk: unknown
source: community
date_added: '2026-02-27'
---
# C4 Context Level: System Context
## Use this skill when
- Working on c4 context level: system context tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for c4 context level: system context
## Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to c4 context level: system context
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
## Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`.
## System Overview
### Short Description
[One-sentence description of what the system does]
### Long Description
[Detailed description of the system's purpose, capabilities, and the problems it solves]
## Personas
### [Persona Name]
- **Type**: [Human User / Programmatic User / External System]
- **Description**: [Who this persona is and what they need]
- **Goals**: [What this persona wants to achieve]
- **Key Features Used**: [List of features this persona uses]
## System Features
### [Feature Name]
- **Description**: [What this feature does]
- **Users**: [Which personas use this feature]
- **User Journey**: [Link to user journey map]
## User Journeys
### [Feature Name] - [Persona Name] Journey
1. [Step 1]: [Description]
2. [Step 2]: [Description]
3. [Step 3]: [Description]
...
### [External System] Integration Journey
1. [Step 1]: [Description]
2. [Step 2]: [Description]
...
## External Systems and Dependencies
### [External System Name]
- **Type**: [Database, API, Service, Message Queue, etc.]
- **Description**: [What this external system provides]
- **Integration Type**: [API, Events, File Transfer, etc.]
- **Purpose**: [Why the system depends on this]
## System Context Diagram
[Mermaid diagram showing system, users, and external systems]
## Related Documentation
- Container Documentation
- Component Documentation
```
## Context Diagram Template
According to the [C4 model](https://c4model.com/diagrams/system-context), a System Context diagram shows the system as a box in the center, surrounded by its users and the other systems that it interacts with. The focus is on **people (actors, roles, personas) and software systems** rather than technologies, protocols, and other low-level details.
Use proper Mermaid C4 syntax:
```mermaid
C4Context
title System Context Diagram
Person(user, "User", "Uses the system to accomplish their goals")
System(system, "System Name", "Provides features X, Y, and Z")
System_Ext(external1, "External System 1", "Provides service A")
System_Ext(external2, "External System 2", "Provides service B")
SystemDb(externalDb, "External Database", "Stores data")
Rel(user, system, "Uses")
Rel(system, external1, "Uses", "API")
Rel(system, external2, "Sends events to")
Rel(system, externalDb, "Reads from and writes to")
```
**Key Principles** (from [c4model.com](https://c4model.com/diagrams/system-context)):
- Focus on **people and software systems**, not technologies
- Show the **system boundary** clearly
- Include all **users** (human and programmatic)
- Include all **external systems** the system interacts with
- Keep it **stakeholder-friendly** - understandable by non-technical audiences
- Avoid showing technologies, protocols, or low-level details
## Example Interactions
- "Create C4 Context-level documentation for the system"
- "Identify all personas and create user journey maps for key features"
- "Document external systems and create a system context diagram"
- "Analyze system documentation and create comprehensive context documentation"
- "Map user journeys for all key features including programmatic users"
## Key Distinctions
- **vs C4-Container agent**: Provides high-level system view; Container agent focuses on deployment architecture
- **vs C4-Component agent**: Focuses on system context; Component agent focuses on logical component structure
- **vs C4-Code agent**: Provides stakeholder-friendly overview; Code agent provides technical code details
## Output Examples
When creating context documentation, provide:
- Clear system descriptions (short and long)
- Comprehensive persona documentation (human and programmatic)
- Complete feature lists with descriptions
- Detailed user journey maps for all key features
- Complete external system and dependency documentation
- Mermaid context diagram showing system, users, and external systems
- Links to container and component documentation
- Stakeholder-friendly documentation understandable by non-technical audiences
- Consistent documentation format
## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.