create-issue-gate — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (antigravity__create-issue-gate) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
✓ Clean — no heuristic safety flags surfaced.
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
No quality issues flagged. ✓
About this skill
Use when starting a new implementation task and an issue must be created with strict acceptance criteria gating before execution.
📄 Read the SKILL.md
--- name: create-issue-gate description: Use when starting a new implementation task and an issue must be created with strict acceptance criteria gating before execution. risk: safe source: community date_added: "2026-03-12" --- # Create Issue Gate ## Overview Create GitHub issues as the single tracking entrypoint for tasks, with a hard gate on acceptance criteria. Core rule: **no explicit, testable acceptance criteria from user => issue stays `draft` and execution is blocked.** ## When to Use - You are starting a new implementation task and want a GitHub issue to be the required tracking entrypoint. - The work must be blocked until the user provides explicit, testable acceptance criteria. - You need to distinguish between `draft`, `ready`, and `blocked` work before execution begins. ## Required Fields Every issue must include these sections: - Problem - Goal - Scope - Non-Goals - Acceptance Criteria - Dependencies/Blockers - Status (`draft` | `ready` | `blocked` | `done`) ## Acceptance Criteria Gate Acceptance criteria are valid only when they are testable and pass/fail checkable. Examples: - valid: "CreateCheckoutLambda-dev returns an openable third-party payment checkout URL" - invalid: "fix checkout" / "improve UX" / "make it better" If criteria are missing or non-testable: - still create the issue - set `Status: draft` - add `Execution Gate: blocked (missing valid acceptance criteria)` - do not move task to execution ## Issue Creation Mode Default mode is direct GitHub creation using `gh issue create`. Use a body template like: ```md ## Problem <what is broken or missing> ## Goal <what outcome is expected> ## Scope - <in scope item> ## Non-Goals - <out of scope item> ## Acceptance Criteria - <explicit, testable criterion 1> ## Dependencies/Blockers - <dependency or none> ## Status draft|ready|blocked|done ## Execution Gate allowed|blocked (<reason>) ``` ## Status Rules - `draft`: missing/weak acceptance criteria or incomplete task definition - `ready`: acceptance criteria are explicit and testable - `blocked`: external dependency prevents progress - `done`: acceptance criteria verified with evidence Never mark an issue `ready` without valid acceptance criteria. ## Handoff to Execution Execution workflows (for example `closed-loop-delivery`) may start only when: - issue status is `ready` - execution gate is `allowed` If issue is `draft`, stop and request user-provided acceptance criteria. ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.