security-bluebook-builder — quality + safety report

In the Skillier index (antigravity__security-bluebook-builder) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage

A
Quality
96/100
Safety

✓ Clean — no heuristic safety flags surfaced.

Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →

Skillproof quality grade A

📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.

Quality notes

No explicit trigger / 'when to use'
low · quality · body
→ Add a 'When to use' section or 'Use this when …' line listing trigger conditions.
No example
low · quality · body
→ Add at least one worked example (input → expected action/output).

About this skill

Build a minimal but real security policy for sensitive apps. The output is a single, coherent Blue Book document using MUST/SHOULD/CAN language, with explicit assumptions, scope, and security gates.

📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: security-bluebook-builder
description: "Build a minimal but real security policy for sensitive apps. The output is a single, coherent Blue Book document using MUST/SHOULD/CAN language, with explicit assumptions, scope, and security gates."
risk: unknown
source: community
---

# Security Bluebook Builder

## When to Use
- You need a concise but enforceable security policy for an app handling sensitive data.
- You want a single Blue Book document with explicit assumptions, controls, and go/no-go gates.
- The user needs policy guidance grounded in scope, threat model, and operational security defaults rather than generic advice.

## Overview
Build a minimal but real security policy for sensitive apps. The output is a single, coherent Blue Book document using MUST/SHOULD/CAN language, with explicit assumptions, scope, and security gates.

## Workflow

### 1) Gather inputs (ask only if missing)
Collect just enough context to fill the template. If the user has not provided details, ask up to 6 short questions:
- What data classes are handled (PII, PHI, financial, tokens, content)?
- What are the trust boundaries (client/server/third parties)?
- How do users authenticate (OAuth, email/password, SSO, device sessions)?
- What storage is used (DB, object storage, logs, analytics)?
- What connectors or third parties are used?
- Retention and deletion expectations (default + user-initiated)?

If the user cannot answer, proceed with safe defaults and mark TODOs.

### 2) Draft the Blue Book
Load `references/bluebook_template.md` and fill it with the provided details. Keep it concise, deterministic, and enforceable.

### 3) Enforce guardrails
- Do not include secrets, tokens, or internal credentials.
- If something is unknown, write "TODO" plus a clear assumption.
- Fail closed: if a capability is required but unavailable, call it out explicitly.
- Keep scope minimal; do not add features or tools beyond what the user asked for.

### 4) Quality checks
Confirm the Blue Book includes:
- Threat model (assumptions + out-of-scope)
- Data classification + handling rules
- Trust boundaries + controls
- Auth/session policy
- Token handling policy
- Logging/audit policy
- Retention/deletion
- Incident response mini-runbook
- Security gates + go/no-go checklist

## Resources
- `references/bluebook_template.md`

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Scan or optimize your own skill →

Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.

Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.