autonomous-agent-patterns — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (davila7__autonomous-agent-patterns) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
5 heuristic flags to review
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
About this skill
Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents. Covers tool integration, permission systems, browser automation, and human-in-the-loop workflows. Use when building AI agents, designing tool APIs, implementing permission systems, or creating autonomous coding assistants.
📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: autonomous-agent-patterns
description: "Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents. Covers tool integration, permission systems, browser automation, and human-in-the-loop workflows. Use when building AI agents, designing tool APIs, implementing permission systems, or creating autonomous coding assistants."
---
# 🕹️ Autonomous Agent Patterns
> Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents, inspired by [Cline](https://github.com/cline/cline) and [OpenAI Codex](https://github.com/openai/codex).
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Building autonomous AI agents
- Designing tool/function calling APIs
- Implementing permission and approval systems
- Creating browser automation for agents
- Designing human-in-the-loop workflows
---
## 1. Core Agent Architecture
### 1.1 Agent Loop
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AGENT LOOP │
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Think │───▶│ Decide │───▶│ Act │ │
│ │ (Reason) │ │ (Plan) │ │ (Execute)│ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │
│ └─────────│ Observe │◀─────────┘ │
│ │ (Result) │ │
│ └──────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
```python
class AgentLoop:
def __init__(self, llm, tools, max_iterations=50):
self.llm = llm
self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
self.max_iterations = max_iterations
self.history = []
def run(self, task: str) -> str:
self.history.append({"role": "user", "content": task})
for i in range(self.max_iterations):
# Think: Get LLM response with tool options
response = self.llm.chat(
messages=self.history,
tools=self._format_tools(),
tool_choice="auto"
)
# Decide: Check if agent wants to use a tool
if response.tool_calls:
for tool_call in response.tool_calls:
# Act: Execute the tool
result = self._execute_tool(tool_call)
# Observe: Add result to history
self.history.append({
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": tool_call.id,
"content": str(result)
})
else:
# No more tool calls = task complete
return response.content
return "Max iterations reached"
def _execute_tool(self, tool_call) -> Any:
tool = self.tools[tool_call.name]
args = json.loads(tool_call.arguments)
return tool.execute(**args)
```
### 1.2 Multi-Model Architecture
```python
class MultiModelAgent:
"""
Use different models for different purposes:
- Fast model for planning
- Powerful model for complex reasoning
- Specialized model for code generation
"""
def __init__(self):
self.models = {
"fast": "gpt-3.5-turbo", # Quick decisions
"smart": "gpt-4-turbo", # Complex reasoning
"code": "claude-3-sonnet", # Code generation
}
def select_model(self, task_type: str) -> str:
if task_type == "planning":
return self.models["fast"]
elif task_type == "analysis":
return self.models["smart"]
elif task_type == "code":
return self.models["code"]
return self.models["smart"]
```
---
## 2. Tool Design Patterns
### 2.1 Tool Schema
```python
class Tool:
"""Base class for agent tools"""
@property
def schema(self) -> dict:
"""JSON Schema for the tool"""
return {
"name": self.name,
"description": self.description,
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": self._get_parameters(),
"required": self._get_required()
}
}
def execute(self, **kwargs) -> ToolResult:
"""Execute the tool and return result"""
raise NotImplementedError
class ReadFileTool(Tool):
name = "read_file"
description = "Read the contents of a file from the filesystem"
def _get_parameters(self):
return {
"path": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Absolute path to the file"
},
"start_line": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Line to start reading from (1-indexed)"
},
"end_line": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Line to stop reading at (inclusive)"
}
}
def _get_required(self):
return ["path"]
def execute(self, path: str, start_line: int = None, end_line: int = None) -> ToolResult:
try:
with open(path, 'r') as f:
lines = f.readlines()
if start_line and end_line:
lines = lines[start_line-1:end_line]
return ToolResult(
success=True,
output="".join(lines)
)
except FileNotFoundError:
return ToolResult(
success=False,
error=f"File not found: {path}"
)
```
### 2.2 Essential Agent Tools
```python
CODING_AGENT_TOOLS = {
# File operations
"read_file": "Read file contents",
"write_file": "Create or overwrite a file",
"edit_file": "Make targeted edits to a file",
"list_directory": "List files and folders",
"search_files": "Search for files by pattern",
# Code understanding
"search_code": "Search for code patterns (grep)",
"get_definition": "Find function/class definition",
"get_references": "Find all references to a symbol",
# Terminal
"run_command": "Execute a shell command",
"read_output": "Read command output",
"send_input": "Send input to running command",
# Browser (optional)
"open_browser": "Open URL in browser",
"click_element": "Click on page element",
"type_text": "Type text into input",
"screenshot": "Capture screenshot",
# Context
"ask_user": "Ask the user a question",
"search_web": "Search the web for information"
}
```
### 2.3 Edit Tool Design
```python
class EditFileTool(Tool):
"""
Precise file editing with conflict detection.
Uses search/replace pattern for reliable edits.
"""
name = "edit_file"
description = "Edit a file by replacing specific content"
def execute(
self,
path: str,
search: str,
replace: str,
expected_occurrences: int = 1
) -> ToolResult:
"""
Args:
path: File to edit
search: Exact text to find (must match exactly, including whitespace)
replace: Text to replace with
expected_occurrences: How many times search should appear (validation)
"""
with open(path, 'r') as f:
content = f.read()
# Validate
actual_occurrences = content.count(search)
if actual_occurrences != expected_occurrences:
return ToolResult(
success=False,
error=f"Expected {expected_occurrences} occurrences, found {actual_occurrences}"
)
if actual_occurrences == 0:
return ToolResult(
success=False,
error="Search text not found in file"
)
# Apply edit
new_content = content.replace(search, replace)
with open(path, 'w') as f:
f.write(new_content)
return ToolResult(
success=True,
output=f"Replaced {actual_occurrences} occurrence(s)"
)
```
---
## 3. Permission & Safety Patterns
### 3.1 Permission Levels
```python
class PermissionLevel(Enum):
# Fully automatic - no user approval needed
AUTO = "auto"
# Ask once per session
ASK_ONCE = "ask_once"
# Ask every time
ASK_EACH = "ask_each"
# Never allow
NEVER = "never"
PERMISSION_CONFIG = {
# Low risk - can auto-approve
"read_file": PermissionLevel.AUTO,
"list_directory": PermissionLevel.AUTO,
"search_code": PermissionLevel.AUTO,
# Medium risk - ask once
"write_file": PermissionLevel.ASK_ONCE,
"edit_file": PermissionLevel.ASK_ONCE,
# High risk - ask each time
"run_command": PermissionLevel.ASK_EACH,
"delete_file": PermissionLevel.ASK_EACH,
# Dangerous - never auto-approve
"sudo_command": PermissionLevel.NEVER,
"format_disk": PermissionLevel.NEVER
}
```
### 3.2 Approval UI Pattern
```python
class ApprovalManager:
def __init__(self, ui, config):
self.ui = ui
self.config = config
self.session_approvals = {}
def request_approval(self, tool_name: str, args: dict) -> bool:
level = self.config.get(tool_name, PermissionLevel.ASK_EACH)
if level == PermissionLevel.AUTO:
return True
if level == PermissionLevel.NEVER:
self.ui.show_error(f"Tool '{tool_name}' is not allowed")
return False
if level == PermissionLevel.ASK_ONCE:
if tool_name in self.session_approvals:
return self.session_approvals[tool_name]
# Show approval dialog
approved = self.ui.show_approval_dialog(
tool=tool_name,
args=args,
risk_level=self._assess_risk(tool_name, args)
)
if level == PermissionLevel.ASK_ONCE:
self.session_approvals[tool_name] = approved
return approved
def _assess_risk(self, tool_name: str, args: dict) -> str:
"""Analyze specific call for risk level"""
if tool_name == "run_command":
cmd = args.get("command", "")
if any(danger in cmd for danger in ["rm -rf", "sudo", "chmod"]):
return "HIGH"
return "MEDIUM"
```
### 3.3 Sandboxing
```python
class SandboxedExecution:
"""
Execute code/commands in isolated environment
"""
def __init__(self, workspace_dir: str):
self.workspace = workspace_dir
self.allowed_commands = ["npm", "python", "node", "git", "ls", "cat"]
self.blocked_paths = ["/etc", "/usr", "/bin", os.path.expanduser("~")]
def validate_path(self, path: str) -> bool:
"""Ensure path is within workspace"""
real_path = os.path.realpath(path)
workspace_real = os.path.realpath(self.workspace)
return real_path.startswith(workspace_real)
def validate_command(self, command: str) -> bool:
"""Check if command is allowed"""
cmd_parts = shlex.split(command)
if not cmd_parts:
return False
base_cmd = cmd_parts[0]
return base_cmd in self.allowed_commands
def execute_sandboxed(self, command: str) -> ToolResult:
if not self.validate_command(command):
return ToolResult(
success=False,
error=f"Command not allowed: {command}"
)
# Execute in isolated environment
result = subprocess.run(
command,
shell=True,
cwd=self.workspace,
capture_output=True,
timeout=30,
env={
**os.environ,
"HOME": self.workspace, # Isolate home directory
}
)
return ToolResult(
success=result.returncode == 0,
outp
… (truncated)Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.