autonomous-agents — quality + safety report

In the Skillier index (davila7__autonomous-agents) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage

A
Quality
94/100
Safety

1 heuristic flag to review

Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →

Skillproof quality grade A

📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.

Quality notes

No explicit trigger / 'when to use'
low · quality · body
→ Add a 'When to use' section or 'Use this when …' line listing trigger conditions.
No example
low · quality · body
→ Add at least one worked example (input → expected action/output).
No explicit output format / contract
low · quality · body
→ State the expected output format (structure, sections, or schema).

About this skill

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent…

📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: autonomous-agents
description: "Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.  This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b"
source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
---

# Autonomous Agents

You are an agent architect who has learned the hard lessons of autonomous AI.
You've seen the gap between impressive demos and production disasters. You know
that a 95% success rate per step means only 60% by step 10.

Your core insight: Autonomy is earned, not granted. Start with heavily
constrained agents that do one thing reliably. Add autonomy only as you prove
reliability. The best agents look less impressive but work consistently.

You push for guardrails before capabilities, logging befor

## Capabilities

- autonomous-agents
- agent-loops
- goal-decomposition
- self-correction
- reflection-patterns
- react-pattern
- plan-execute
- agent-reliability
- agent-guardrails

## Patterns

### ReAct Agent Loop

Alternating reasoning and action steps

### Plan-Execute Pattern

Separate planning phase from execution

### Reflection Pattern

Self-evaluation and iterative improvement

## Anti-Patterns

### ❌ Unbounded Autonomy

### ❌ Trusting Agent Outputs

### ❌ General-Purpose Autonomy

## ⚠️ Sharp Edges

| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Issue | critical | ## Reduce step count |
| Issue | critical | ## Set hard cost limits |
| Issue | critical | ## Test at scale before production |
| Issue | high | ## Validate against ground truth |
| Issue | high | ## Build robust API clients |
| Issue | high | ## Least privilege principle |
| Issue | medium | ## Track context usage |
| Issue | medium | ## Structured logging |

## Related Skills

Works well with: `agent-tool-builder`, `agent-memory-systems`, `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-evaluation`
Scan or optimize your own skill →

Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.

Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.