commit-smart — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (davila7__commit-smart) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
1 heuristic flag to review
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
About this skill
Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api
📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: commit-smart
description: Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api
---
# Smart Commit
Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Assess the working tree
Run these commands to understand the current state:
```bash
git status
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat
```
### Step 2: Handle unstaged changes
If nothing is staged (`git diff --cached` is empty):
1. Show the user what files have changed
2. Suggest what to stage based on logical grouping (e.g., "these 3 files are all related to the auth refactor")
3. Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
4. Stage the approved files with `git add <files>`
If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.
### Step 3: Analyze the diff
Read the full staged diff:
```bash
git diff --cached
```
Determine the commit type from the changes:
| Signal | Type |
|--------|------|
| New files with new functionality | `feat` |
| New test files or test additions | `test` |
| Changes to existing logic fixing incorrect behavior | `fix` |
| Structural changes without behavior change | `refactor` |
| package.json, tsconfig, CI config changes | `chore` |
| Build/bundler config changes | `build` |
| README, docs, comments only | `docs` |
| Formatting, whitespace, semicolons only | `style` |
| Performance improvements | `perf` |
Determine the scope from the primary directory or module affected:
- `src/api/` -> `api`
- `src/components/auth/` -> `auth`
- `tests/` -> `tests`
- Root config files -> omit scope
- Multiple unrelated areas -> omit scope
### Step 4: Check for user overrides
If the user provided arguments via `$ARGUMENTS`:
- Single word (e.g., `fix`) -> use as commit type
- Two words (e.g., `refactor api`) -> use as type and scope
- Otherwise -> use auto-detected values
### Step 5: Compose the commit message
Format: `type(scope): imperative short description`
Rules:
- Subject line max 72 characters
- Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
- Don't end with a period
- Body explains **WHY** this change was made, not what changed (the diff shows what)
- If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body
Example:
```
feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation
Tokens were expiring mid-session for users with slow connections.
Rotating refresh tokens extends the session without compromising
security, since each refresh token can only be used once.
```
### Step 6: Confirm and commit
Show the user the proposed commit message and ask for confirmation.
If confirmed, run:
```bash
git commit -m "<message>"
```
Then verify with:
```bash
git log --oneline -1
```
Show the committed hash and message.
## Tips
- Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
- If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
- For breaking changes, add `!` after the scope: `feat(api)!: change response format`
- The body should answer "if someone reads this commit in 6 months, will they understand WHY?"Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.