crafting-effective-readmes — quality + safety report
In the Skillier index (davila7__crafting-effective-readmes) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage
✓ Clean — no heuristic safety flags surfaced.
Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →
📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.
Quality notes
About this skill
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
📄 Read the SKILL.md
--- name: crafting-effective-readmes description: Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type. --- # Crafting Effective READMEs ## Overview READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder. **Always ask:** Who will read this, and what do they need to know? ## Process ### Step 1: Identify the Task **Ask:** "What README task are you working on?" | Task | When | |------|------| | **Creating** | New project, no README yet | | **Adding** | Need to document something new | | **Updating** | Capabilities changed, content is stale | | **Reviewing** | Checking if README is still accurate | ### Step 2: Task-Specific Questions **Creating initial README:** 1. What type of project? (see Project Types below) 2. What problem does this solve in one sentence? 3. What's the quickest path to "it works"? 4. Anything notable to highlight? **Adding a section:** 1. What needs documenting? 2. Where should it go in the existing structure? 3. Who needs this info most? **Updating existing content:** 1. What changed? 2. Read current README, identify stale sections 3. Propose specific edits **Reviewing/refreshing:** 1. Read current README 2. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.) 3. Flag outdated sections 4. Update "Last reviewed" date if present ### Step 3: Always Ask After drafting, ask: **"Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"** ## Project Types | Type | Audience | Key Sections | Template | |------|----------|--------------|----------| | **Open Source** | Contributors, users worldwide | Install, Usage, Contributing, License | `templates/oss.md` | | **Personal** | Future you, portfolio viewers | What it does, Tech stack, Learnings | `templates/personal.md` | | **Internal** | Teammates, new hires | Setup, Architecture, Runbooks | `templates/internal.md` | | **Config** | Future you (confused) | What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas | `templates/xdg-config.md` | **Ask the user** if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything. ## Essential Sections (All Types) Every README needs at minimum: 1. **Name** - Self-explanatory title 2. **Description** - What + why in 1-2 sentences 3. **Usage** - How to use it (examples help) ## References - `section-checklist.md` - Which sections to include by project type - `style-guide.md` - Common README mistakes and prose guidance - `using-references.md` - Guide to deeper reference materials
Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.
Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.