trailmark-summary — quality + safety report

In the Skillier index (trailofbits__trailmark-summary) · scanned 2026-06-03 · engine: builtin+triage

A
Quality
100/100
Safety

✓ Clean — no heuristic safety flags surfaced.

Heuristic flags from the builtin scanner, which is known to over-flag (it trips on legitimate env-reading integrations, security skills, and library .eval calls). This is NOT an authoritative malicious verdict — re-scan with SkillSpector for the authoritative result. Run the authoritative scan →

Skillproof quality grade A

📇 This skill is in the Skillier index (curated · deduped · quality-filtered). Install Skillier to route & load it into your AI client.

Quality notes

No quality issues flagged. ✓

About this skill

Runs a Trailmark summary analysis on a codebase. Returns auto-detected languages, entry point count, and dependency list. Use when vivisect or galvanize needs a quick structural overview. Triggers: trailmark summary, code summary, structural overview.

📄 Read the SKILL.md
---
name: trailmark-summary
description: "Runs a Trailmark summary analysis on a codebase. Returns auto-detected languages, entry point count, and dependency list. Use when vivisect or galvanize needs a quick structural overview. Triggers: trailmark summary, code summary, structural overview."
allowed-tools: Bash Read Grep Glob
---

# Trailmark Summary

Runs `trailmark analyze --language auto --summary` on a target directory.

## When to Use

- Vivisect Phase 0 needs a quick structural overview before decomposition
- Galvanize Phase 1 needs detected languages and entry point count
- Quick orientation on an unfamiliar codebase before deeper analysis

## When NOT to Use

- Full structural analysis with all passes needed (use `trailmark-structural`)
- Detailed code graph queries (use the main `trailmark` skill directly)
- You need hotspot scores or taint data (use `trailmark-structural`)

## Rationalizations to Reject

| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|
| "I can read the code manually instead" | Manual reading misses parser-based language detection, dependency data, and entry point enumeration | Install and run trailmark |
| "Language detection doesn't matter" | Wrong language selection produces empty or partial analysis | Use Trailmark's parser-based detection or `--language auto` |
| "Partial output is good enough" | Missing any of the three required outputs (detected languages, entry points, dependencies) means incomplete analysis | Verify all three are present |
| "Tool isn't installed, I'll skip it" | This skill exists specifically to run trailmark | Report the installation gap instead of skipping |

## Usage

The target directory is passed via the `args` parameter.

## Execution

**Step 1: Check that trailmark is available.**

```bash
trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null || \
  uv run trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null
```

If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed"
and return. Do NOT run `pip install`, `uv pip install`,
`git clone`, or any install command. The user must install
trailmark themselves.

**Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API.**

```bash
python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys

from trailmark.parse import detect_languages

print(json.dumps(detect_languages(sys.argv[1])))
PY
```

If the import fails, rerun the same snippet with `uv run python - "{args}"`.
If the result is `[]`, report "Trailmark found no supported languages under
target" and return.

**Step 3: Run the summary with auto-detection.**

```bash
trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {args} 2>&1 || \
  uv run trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {args} 2>&1
```

**Step 4: Verify the output.**

The output must include ALL THREE of:
1. Detected languages from Step 2
2. `Entrypoints:` line from the summary output
3. `Dependencies:` line from the summary output

If any are missing, report the gap. Do not fabricate output.

Return the detected language list plus the full Trailmark summary output.
Scan or optimize your own skill →

Want a live grade + an embeddable README badge? Run your skill through the free scanner.

Graded independently by Skillproof — nothing to sell the author. Quality is mechanical + corpus-grounded; safety flags are heuristic (builtin+triage), not a malicious verdict.